Tedx wrote:Dont you just go to sleep due to the increase in the C02 levels?
Hopefully.
Thanks to smokey01,bungeejumper,stockton,Anonymous,bruncher, for Donating to support the site
Tedx wrote:Dont you just go to sleep due to the increase in the C02 levels?
Tedx wrote:BullDog wrote:A secret stash of cyanide pills on board might have been handy for such a nasty outcome. Chances of survival ebbing away by the minute.
Dont you just go to sleep due to the increase in the C02 levels?
People say that you cannot safely mate titanium with fibreglass, but we've done it.
BullDog wrote:Tedx wrote:
Dont you just go to sleep due to the increase in the C02 levels?
Good question.
Sorcery wrote:It's not like Carbon Monoxide which does make you sleepy. An excess of Carbon dioxide in the air breathed, is more distressing I would imagine from this description : https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default ... ioxide.pdf
The instant death of a structural failure sounds preferable to me.
Sorcery wrote:
The instant death of a structural failure sounds preferable to me.
MrFoolish wrote:Sorcery wrote:It's not like Carbon Monoxide which does make you sleepy. An excess of Carbon dioxide in the air breathed, is more distressing I would imagine from this description : https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default ... ioxide.pdf
The instant death of a structural failure sounds preferable to me.
I seem to recall a documentary where they looked for the least distressing form of capital punishment and they decided carbon dioxide was the way.
Tedx wrote:MrFoolish wrote:
I seem to recall a documentary where they looked for the least distressing form of capital punishment and they decided carbon dioxide was the way.
If it was the Michael Portillo documentary, it was nitrogen hypoxia.
Lanark wrote:This is a good summary of the Elon Musk levels of bad engineering in that sub.
https://twitter.com/LadyDoctorSays/status/1671704319115300864
mc2fool wrote:Lanark wrote:This is a good summary of the Elon Musk levels of bad engineering in that sub.
https://twitter.com/LadyDoctorSays/status/1671704319115300864
Umm, ok, so how do we know that "LadyDoctorSays" is an expert in such matters? Or are we just to be impressed by the structural integrity shown in her profile photo ... ? https://twitter.com/LadyDoctorSays/photo
mike wrote:mc2fool wrote:But possibly worse is it survives the first few trips, giving a false sense of confidence, and then fails as a consequence of it being strained during those first few....
Yes, a bit like the Comet in the 1950's that had metal fatigue due to the pressurisation from earlier flights.
Three fatal Comet 1 crashes due to structural problems, specifically BOAC Flight 783 on 2 May 1953, BOAC Flight 781 on 10 January 1954 and South African Airways Flight 201 on 8 April 1954, led to the grounding of the entire Comet fleet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet#Accidents_and_incidents
MrFoolish wrote:So much for GB News claiming they had insider information that SOS was being banged out. I think Ofcom should investigate this.
MrFoolish wrote:So much for GB News claiming they had insider information that SOS was being banged out. I think Ofcom should investigate this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests