tjh290633 wrote:Incidentally, one of my friends did nothing for his 4th year and was awarded 4th class honours, unprecedented for some years, I believe.
TJH
I was told that one of my Comp Sci lecturers got a 4th from oxford.
Thanks to smokey01,bungeejumper,stockton,Anonymous,bruncher, for Donating to support the site
tjh290633 wrote:Incidentally, one of my friends did nothing for his 4th year and was awarded 4th class honours, unprecedented for some years, I believe.
TJH
didds wrote:tjh290633 wrote:Incidentally, one of my friends did nothing for his 4th year and was awarded 4th class honours, unprecedented for some years, I believe.
I was told that one of my Comp Sci lecturers got a 4th from oxford.
Lootman wrote:didds wrote:I was told that one of my Comp Sci lecturers got a 4th from oxford.
Some universities will award a degree below a 3rd. But rather than call it a 4th (with honours) it is called an "ordinary" or "pass" degree, without honours.
Given that "honours" doesn't have any formal meaning that I know of, the difference may be moot.
UncleEbenezer wrote:My own Cambridge letters include the relatively-unusual MMath on top of the BA and MA.
Newroad wrote:Morning All.
This thread has had me searching for a quote I (very annoyingly) seem unable to find, from either "Yes Minister" or "Yes Prime Minster".
I think that the discussion happens between Sir Humphrey and someone else (but not Hacker) and could quite possibly be about discussing moving/touring the National Opera or National Theatre (away from Covent Garden?). Sir Humphrey is somewhere between annoyed and horrified, and says something like"What will be next, the universities? Both of them?"
Hallucigenia wrote:Loup321 wrote:Degrees are no longer awarded by the University of London, but instead by the individual Universities. Back in 2001, all Doctoral degrees were from the University of London, but 2008 was during the transition and candidates could choose. Since about 2010 it's all been from the individual Universities. I believe undergraduate degrees switched earlier, but I did mine elsewhere.
I suspect your experience is with Imperial?
Imperial was always the cuckoo in the nest, that wanted to become a university before any of the other colleges. So it broke free in ?2007? from memory and became an independent, degree-awarding university. The same privilege was offered to all the other colleges by the University of London Act 2018 but not all of them have taken up the option, and I think it was one of those things where actual implementation got held up by Covid-19.
Hallucigenia wrote:UncleEbenezer wrote:My own Cambridge letters include the relatively-unusual MMath on top of the BA and MA.
Heh, missed that one, at one point I was offered the opportunity to be MA MSc MPhil.... Master of all trades, jack of none.
Loup321 wrote:Hallucigenia wrote:
I suspect your experience is with Imperial?
Imperial was always the cuckoo in the nest, that wanted to become a university before any of the other colleges. So it broke free in ?2007? from memory and became an independent, degree-awarding university. The same privilege was offered to all the other colleges by the University of London Act 2018 but not all of them have taken up the option, and I think it was one of those things where actual implementation got held up by Covid-19.
Actually, it was UCL. From your comments, and my memory of the proposed UCL/Imperial merger, maybe they were both trying to break free at the same time. The merger that was described by my head of department as "spherically a bad idea" - no matter which way you looked at it, it was a bad idea. But we still had the discuss it and have joint meetings with our counterpart department at Imperial.
UCL have taken a few smaller colleges in. Perhaps because they were too small to want to change, but too specialist and well established to want to close. The disparity in systems is mind-blowing! And no one will change "because we've always done it this way" so we have people dragging their feet over making the university more efficient.
Newroad wrote:Thanks, Hallucigenia.
Much appreciated
I wasn't too far off - the opera was indeed mentioned - but it wasn't the episode whether the National Opera/Theatre was threatened with losing it's home.
Regards, Newroad
Loup321 wrote:Actually, it was UCL. From your comments, and my memory of the proposed UCL/Imperial merger, maybe they were both trying to break free at the same time. The merger that was described by my head of department as "spherically a bad idea" - no matter which way you looked at it, it was a bad idea. But we still had the discuss it and have joint meetings with our counterpart department at Imperial.
UCL have taken a few smaller colleges in. Perhaps because they were too small to want to change, but too specialist and well established to want to close. The disparity in systems is mind-blowing! And no one will change "because we've always done it this way" so we have people dragging their feet over making the university more efficient.
Lootman wrote:didds wrote:I was told that one of my Comp Sci lecturers got a 4th from oxford.
Some universities will award a degree below a 3rd. But rather than call it a 4th (with honours) it is called an "ordinary" or "pass" degree, without honours.
Given that "honours" doesn't have any formal meaning that I know of, the difference may be moot.
csearle wrote:I was awarded an "honours" from Plymouth.
Chris
CNAA.UncleEbenezer wrote:csearle wrote:I was awarded an "honours" from Plymouth.
Chris
CNAA, or are you on the young side for a Fool, with a degree from the mid-90s or later?
Newroad wrote:Hi stevensfo.
There is so much good stuff - probably the best comedy writing of all time (though Porridge on occasion and some but not all of Gerald Wiley's stuff might give it a shake). I think it was more a case of discouraging patients rather than doctors in the one you are referring to - but certainly a good one.
I was always a fan of Sir Desmond Glaisebrook whenever he appeared.
As for one liners so to speak, then one where Bernard comes out from a meeting between Sir Arnold and Sir Humphrey and tells Hacker something like"It was absolutely brutal in there. Sir Arnold told Sir Humphrey he wasn't actually officially reprimanding him!"
Regards, Newroad
Newroad wrote:Hi stevensfo.
Yes, he's the one (though I may have mis-spelled his name - it appears to have been Glazebrook). Here's one along your theme from himSir Desmond Glazebrook: They've broken the rules.
Sir Humphrey: What, you mean the insider trading regulations?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: No.
Sir Humphrey: Oh. Well, that's one relief.
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: I mean of course they've broken those, but they've broken the basic rule of the City.
Sir Humphrey: I didn't know there were any?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Just the one. If you're incompetent you have to be honest, and if you're crooked you have to be clever. See, if you're honest, then when you make a pig's breakfast of things the chaps rally round and help you out.
Sir Humphrey: If you're crooked?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Well, if you're making good profits for them, chaps don't start asking questions; they're not stupid. Well, not that stupid.
Sir Humphrey: So the ideal is a firm which is honest and clever.
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Yes. Let me know if you ever come across one, won't you?
I rather like this one tooSir Humphrey Appleby: Didn't you read the Financial Times this morning?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Never do.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Well you're a banker, surely you read the Financial Times?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Can't understand it. Full of economic theory.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Why do you buy it?
Sir Desmond Glazebrook: Oh, you know, it's part of the uniform.
Great stuff
Regards, Newroad
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests