mc2fool wrote:Forget the solicitors, you'll have to tell and ask the insurers.
This is something you should almost certainly
not do.
This type of policy is an off the shelf product costing next to nothing, and such policies are routinely used by lazy and /or incompetent conveyancers as it’s easier than having to consider whether the risk being insured against is actually a risk at all.
In the vast majority of cases there is no justification at all for a chancel repair policy as the risk just doesn't exist, but in the very rare cases it might exist the solicitor will have bought one not just for your protection but also to comply with their obligations to your mortgage lender, if any.
However, if you go wading in with awkward questions to the insurance company there's a serious risk that they might say the policy would be voided if you ran a business from the property. If so, your solicitor would no longer be able to tick the mortgage lender's box, and they would have to report back that although there was an identified risk they could no longer get an insurance policy to cover it as you’d spooked the insurers.
In that event the lender would probably refuse to release the loan, or would at least insist on the matter being fully investigated, which would potentially be a costly and long-winded exercise, with no guarantee of a good outcome.
In practical terms it's almost certainly of no consequence anyway, as the purpose for which the property is used will almost certainly be entirely irrelevant to the question of whether it has any actual liability.
You should therefore go back to your solicitor and ask them to explain exactly why they are recommending the policy, and to identify what risk there actually is. You may find that there is no actual risk at all, and that the policy is completely unnecessary.