mc2fool wrote:Crazbe7 wrote:
Then it should be followed up before paying for your suggested 'legal clout'.
Maybe so although sometimes a simple 50 quid letter before action from a solicitor can work wonders.
The important thing is for the op to pull their finger out before they lose the opportunity presented by the fact that the upstairs lessee is selling their flat, as suggested very early on in this thread (and not only by me).
This thread is now a month old. Has the op filed a formal complaint / dispute with the lessee and with the management company, as recommended? And if so has it been conveyed to the buyer's solicitors and to the buyer?
Yeah sure contact the home insurance but any further delays could end up being a lot more faff and a lot more expensive than a quick chat with a solicitor...
Thanks so much mc2fool
I'm happy to report back that I finally got both the upstairs and downstairs' agreements to divert the pipes. I did contact my conveyancer at the beginning of the journey and they never responded. To be honest they were not that great but I only have one experience, so maybe that's standard. During the purchasing process, I had to be the one who kept chasing them, I almost lost my mortgage window by 1 day!
I actually found a plan from the council. It looks like the pipe was altered during the renovation when the extension was added to the downstairs Studio. That would be my last point to my neighbours to state that they misfitted the pipe in the process, hid the fact from me (they said the building was altered back in the 70s, early 80s by the previous owners), and caused damage to me and the building.
However, I'm pleased I don't have to do that to cause more awkwardness. Now I'm keen to find out whether the diversion can relieve me from any work that requires lifting my floorboard, to correct the stagnant water build-up situation. I'll keep you guys posted on how it unfolds.
I greatly appreciate all your feedback and support throughout the process.
Best,
Patty